Wisconsin court documents

Article source Link

Actually, the residency requirement in Huntington goes back to 1965, when it was added to the city charter by the voters.
It was approved again by the voters when the city adopted the strong mayor form of government.
Huntington City Council brought the issue up again about six years ago when it enacted an ordinance saying that if you are going to work for the city and you were hired after 2002, you're going to have to live in the city or face dismissal.
Mayor David Felinton vetoed the ordinance, but council overrode the veto. He believes it hurts recruiting efforts, and notes that the number of applicants taking civil service exams since 2002 has decreased substantially.
The residency requirement has been to the state Supreme Court five times since 1983.
In 1993, a circuit court judge stopped the city from enforcing the requirement until it could figure out how to do it uniformly.
It remained unenforced until council enacted the new ordinance in 2002.
The latest attack on the residency requirement wound up in the state Supreme Court again, where last week the court ruled that it doesn't violate employees' right to due process.
That means, the court said, that those employees who don't provide proof they live in the city must be given a due process hearing, but may be fired if they can't provide proof of residency.
No one is sure how all this is going to play out

Italian marble statues

Umbrella sun

Marble fireplace mantles

Rectangle patio umbrella

Large garden statues

Mn court cases

Clear plastic umbrellas

Court reporter forums

Outdoor deer statues

Weber fireplace

Bronze fireplace tools

Commercial umbrella

Fireplace pics

Federal court interpreter

Phila traffic court

Bulldog statues

Plastic umbrella base

Patio tilt umbrella